| Component 1 — Weighted cost of next unit deployed |
| LP capital contribution | 4.80% | 480 bps | 60.0% of funding × 8.00% preferred return = 4.80%. The largest single cost, because LP capital is both the biggest slice and the most expensive. |
| Subscription line contribution | 1.56% | 156 bps | 30.0% of funding × 5.20% all-in rate = 1.56%. Cheaper than LP capital, which is why sub lines are drawn first. |
| NAV facility contribution | 0.91% | 91 bps | 10.0% of funding × 9.10% all-in rate = 0.91%. The most expensive source per euro, but only a tenth of the mix. |
| Component 1 | 7.27% | 727 bps | 4.80% + 1.56% + 0.91%. An annual rate: the blended cost of holding this funding mix for a year. |
| Component 2 — Net idle capital drag · measured over 90 days |
| Preferred return accruing on idle capital | 3,945,205 | EUR | EUR 200m idle × (90 ÷ 365) × 8.00% preferred return. The preferred return accrues to LPs from the day capital is called, not the day it is invested — so 90 days of waiting costs real money. |
| Forgone deployment return on idle capital | 6,904,110 | EUR | EUR 200m idle × (90 ÷ 365) × 14.00%. The return this capital was not earning. Charged here on exactly the same basis as Component 5 charges it on drawn capital: the forgone return belongs to the deployment opportunity, not to the funding source. Omitting it from idle capital whilst charging it on facility draws — as most models do — makes LP capital look cheaper than borrowing. |
| Commitment fee on undrawn facilities | 123,288 | EUR | EUR 100m undrawn × (90 ÷ 365) × 0.50%. Charged on the undrawn portion of the facility, not on the idle cash balance — a distinction most models get wrong in the fund’s favour. |
| Less: interest earned on placement | (1,578,082) | EUR | EUR 200m × (90 ÷ 365) × 3.20% deposit rate. Earned only where the LPA permits idle cash to be held in interest-bearing accounts. If it does not, this line is zero. |
| Net idle drag | 9,394,521 | EUR | EUR 3,945,205 + EUR 6,904,110 + EUR 123,288 − EUR 1,578,082. What 90 days of idleness actually costs the fund. |
| Component 2 | 3.61% | 361 bps | EUR 9,394,521 ÷ EUR 260m non-working capital = 3.61%. A one-off cost per euro of capital called or drawn and not yet deployed. |
| Component 3 — FX / IRS sourcing cost (optimised) · premium form |
| Path A — direct native-currency draw | 5.65% | % | Native-currency tranche rate |
| Path B — base-currency draw + hedge | 5.88% | % | Base tranche rate 5.20% + forward points 0.68%, which embed the cross-currency basis |
| Selected path cost | 5.65% | % | Lower path, only where a multi-currency draw is confirmed available |
| FX premium over base-currency tranche | 0.45% | 45 bps | 5.65% selected path − 5.20% base-currency tranche. This premium is the only incremental cost: the base-currency draw is already priced inside Component 1, so charging the full path rate here would double-count it. |
| FX sourcing cost | 0.18% | 18 bps | 0.45% premium × 40% of deployment requiring FX = 0.18% |
| IRS carry cost | 0.14% | 14 bps | 0.45% carry on swapping floating to fixed × 30% notional coverage = 0.14% |
| Memo: optimisation saving vs hedged path | 0.09% | 9 bps | (5.88% − 5.65%) × 40% FX proportion. What the path choice is worth at fund level. |
| Component 3 | 0.32% | 32 bps | FX premium 18 bps + IRS carry 14 bps. Set the FX proportion to 0% and this component falls away entirely. |
| Component 4 — Marginal management fee drag |
| Fee basis (selected) | Commitments | — | Commitments | Called capital | NAV |
| Component 4 | 0.00% | 0 bps | The fee the next unit of deployment adds: nil on a commitments basis, because the fee does not move with deployment. On a called-capital basis it is 1.50% × the 60% fresh-call share = 0.90%. On a NAV basis it is the full 1.50%. The fee level a fund pays is a separate matter — see the basis diagnostic on the Output tab. |
| Component 5 — Drawn capital opportunity cost · subscription facility, measured over 75 days |
| Combined annualised rate | 16.00% | 1,600 bps | 5.20% subscription facility rate + 14.00% forgone deployment return − 3.20% deposit yield earned whilst the cash sits. You pay interest on the borrowing and lose the return the money would have made if invested, offset only by what the balance earns on deposit. Same construction as Component 2. |
| Drawn capital opportunity cost | 1,972,603 | EUR | EUR 60m drawn × (75 ÷ 365) × 16.00%. The 75 days run from the drawdown date to the date the money was actually deployed. |
| Memo: sub line interest alone | 641,096 | EUR | EUR 60m × (75 ÷ 365) × 5.20%. This is the only part the bank invoices for, and the only part most treasury systems record. |
| Memo: negative carry against idle cash | 246,575 | EUR | EUR 60m × (75 ÷ 365) × (5.20% − 3.20%). Borrowing on the subscription facility whilst holding EUR 200m of idle cash earning the deposit rate. No framework required to see this one — it is arithmetic on two rates the treasurer already knows. |
| Component 5 | 0.76% | 76 bps | EUR 1,972,603 ÷ EUR 260m non-working capital = 0.76%. A one-off cost per euro of capital called or drawn and not yet deployed. |
| Marginal ICC — total |
| Marginal ICC | 11.96% | 1,196 bps | Sum of components 1–5. Components are rounded to the nearest basis point; the total is computed on unrounded figures. |
| Typical static hurdle (reference only) | 8.00% | 800 bps | The proxy this framework replaces — shown for contrast, not used in any calculation |
| ICC vs static hurdle | +3.96% | +396 bps | Positive = the static hurdle understates true cost of capital |